And now...the winners of the 2007 Drammies
Wow.
What an interesting award season THIS has been.
We've had quite a bit of over-exuberance regarding the awards.
And the winners don't even get a cool statuette! Just the knowledge that a world-wide audience of thousands of whisky lovers had the chance to nominate and select the winners.
You've likely read here and in all of the UK papers regarding an unfortunate incident. But never fear, the awards come off untarnished...as do the nominees.
One significant point of order on voting and how votes were counted.
We looked VERY closely at all of the votes - and anything that so much as hinted of impropriety was disregarded.
What was worthy of being disregarded?
- Suspicious Volumes from industry domains - I don't want to create a misconception. Industry people were certainly allowed to vote in the awards - there are a lot of industry people who read this site. It was the volume of emails from single domains that created a problem for me. So floods of emails with similar votes from industry domains were disregarded.
- Single votes - There were some nominees who let their fans and friends know that they were up for an award. Nothing wrong with that - BUT all votes that came in which consisted of a single vote, for a single product in a single category were disregarded.
- Voting in a bloc - You certainly did not have to have an opinion on every category - most people did not. And as stated in #2 above, single votes were disregarded. But if someone submitted votes only in categories in which a single company's products were nominated - and only voted for those products, the votes were disregarded.
- Uninformed votes - A couple of votes were disregarded for specific reasons. There was no ill intent in these votes, BUT when a statement was included that said (for example) "I haven't tried any of these products, but like the idea of a "Coffee-flavoured malt", then the vote was disregarded. You get the idea.
The Drammies were created to be, above all, a "People's Choice" award and to try to disregard the influence that the industry has over the spirits writers and periodicals that generally grant the awards that get touted.
No fees here. Only nominations for the more interesting things out there, and awards for (hopefully) the most deserving products.
I've also included some of the more entertaining/insightful quotes that accompanied some of the votes.
So without further ado, your winners...
Continue reading "And now...the winners of the 2007 Drammies" »




